bola slot vip
bola slot vip
A high-profile barrister who was cleared of misconduct over social media posts has called on the head of the Bar Standards Board to resign. Dr Charlotte Proudman, who specialises in family law, had faced a Bar Standards Board (BSB) disciplinary tribunal over a 14-part Twitter thread criticising a judge’s ruling over a domestic abuse case, saying it echoed a “boys’ club”. However, the five charges against the 36-year-old were dropped on Thursday. In an interview with The Times, Dr Proudman described the position of Mark Neale, the board’s director-general, as “untenable” and said its chairwoman, Kathryn Stone, should also stand down. “They need a change, not just in those two individuals, though, because, of course, it seeps down to the rest of the organisation,” she said. Barrister Charlotte Proudman arrives at a misconduct hearing in London accompanied by supporters (Stefan Rousseau/PA) However, she said that “under the current leadership, it’s just not going to be possible”. The charges alleged Dr Proudman had “failed to act with integrity” in posting the tweets, that they amounted to professional misconduct, were “misleading” and “inaccurately reflected the findings of the judge” in the case. The women’s rights campaigner was also accused of behaving in a way “which was likely to diminish the trust and confidence which the public placed in her and in the profession”, and that she “knowingly or recklessly misled or attempted to mislead the public” by making the posts. But panel chairman Nicholas Ainley found her tweets are protected under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right of freedom of expression. He said her tweets did not “gravely damage” the judiciary, which would “put them outside” of Article 10 protection, even if they “might not have been pleasant for any judge to read” or even “hurtful”. “We take the view that the judiciary of England and Wales is far more robust than that,” he said. The panel also concluded that some of the tweets were only inaccurate “to a minor degree” and not to the extent necessary for a charge of a lack of integrity. Speaking after the hearing, Dr Proudman told the PA news agency: “This ruling is a victory for women’s rights and a right to freedom of speech. “The prosecution against me brought by my regulatory body, the Bar Standards Board, should never have happened and I said that from day one. “I criticised a domestic abuse judgment. Everyone should have the right to do that, whether you’re a barrister or not. Our justice system, which I strongly believe in, is robust enough to withstand criticism from me.” She believes her tweets help “foster confidence” in the justice system, adding: “Only that way can we go about building change and a better treatment for all victims, women and children and men who are affected by domestic abuse.” Explaining that the BSB appears to have spent almost £40,000 “of barristers’ money” on instructing counsel in her case, she added: “I think it’s shameful that they’re using our money to pay for, in my view, malicious, vexatious prosecutions which I have no doubt was a personal attack against me as a woman and as a feminist, as an outspoken critic and advocate for women’s rights.” Dr Proudman called for “systemic change” within the board. “They don’t understand gender, they don’t understand diversity, I don’t think they’ve ever heard of the concept misogyny and certainly not institutional misogyny,” she said. “Until they recognise the deeply rooted, entrenched issue of bullying, harassment, sexism at the bar, for which I have suffered relentlessly... and own up to it I don’t think we’re going to see any change and I have no confidence in them.” She told of how male barristers have called her insulting names on social media and made derogatory comments about her. In the posts on April 6 2022, Dr Proudman referenced a case in which her client alleged she had been subjected to coercive and controlling behaviour by her husband, a part-time judge, meaning she had been “unable to freely enter” the couple’s “post-nuptial” financial agreement. Commenting on the ruling by Family Court judge Sir Jonathan Cohen, Dr Proudman wrote: “I represented Amanda Traharne. “She said she was coerced into signing a post-nuptial agreement by her husband (who is a part-time judge). I lost the case. “I do not accept the Judge’s reasoning. I will never accept the minimisation of domestic abuse.” She continued: “Demeaning the significance of domestic abuse has the affect of silencing victims and rendering perpetrators invisible. “This judgement has echoes of (t)he ‘boys club’ which still exists among men in powerful positions.” In the thread, Dr Proudman wrote that the judge had described the relationship of the couple as “tempestuous”, which she argued was a “trivialisation” of domestic abuse. “Tempestuous? Lose his temper? Isn’t this the trivialisation of domestic abuse & gendered language. This is not normal married life,” she wrote.Bathinda: Senior farmer leader Joginder Singh Ugrahan , who was active during the first farmers’ agitation and leads largest farmers’ group in Punjab, has accepted differences within the farmer forums, including SKM (Non-Political) and Kisan Mazdoor Morcha. Ugrahan said repeated calls for ‘Delhi Chalo’ were not right. The struggle for the MSP is bigger than making the govt repeal the farm laws, he said. Such struggles should be fought with a lot of planning, by taking everyone along. He also said Jagjit Singh Dallewal should have avoided fast unto death as they all knew that the central govt was anti-farmer. Ugrahan, however, stressed the need for unity among the farmer groups to achieve common goals. We also published the following articles recently 'Decided to sacrifice myself': Farmer leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal writes open letter to PM Modi as his fast unto death enters Day 17 Punjabi farmer leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal is on a hunger strike, demanding a legal guarantee for Minimum Support Price (MSP) and other farmer-centric issues. In an open letter to PM Modi, Dallewal highlighted the unfulfilled promises regarding MSP, referencing a 2011 letter by Modi himself advocating for MSP protection. Security tightened at Shambhu Border as farmers set to resume 'Dilli Chalo' march today Farmers renewed their 'Dilli Chalo' march for a 300th day, met with police barricades and tear gas at the Shambhu Border. They demand a legal guarantee for MSP and parliamentary discussion of their concerns. Farmer leader Sarwan Singh Pandher criticized the government's inaction and the security forces' aggressive tactics. Protests are also planned against BJP leaders' entry into Punjab. Haryana khap leaders respond to farmers march to Delhi: Demand unity among Punjab farmers Haryana's Khap leaders have expressed their willingness to join the farmers' protest march to Delhi, but only if the United Morcha (SKM) unites first. They criticized the internal divisions within Punjab farmer groups, hindering the movement's progress. Khaps also highlighted the lack of prior communication between Punjab and Haryana farmers and urged the government to fulfill its MSP promise.
Sam Hicks, defense lead Abilene Christian over Northern Arizona 24-0 to extend 1st trip to playoffs
Georgia's Dasha Vidmanova, Columbia's Michael Zheng win NCAA singles titlesMiguel Tomley scores 28 to lead Weber State over Pepperdine 68-53 at Arizona Tip-Off
India ‘s connection with railways is deeply embedded in its history, dating back to the mid-19th century when the first train chugged from Mumbai to Thane in 1853. Since then, trains have become synonymous with the country’s vastness and diversity. From the bustling stations to the quiet, scenic routes through remote villages, trains have been a lifeline for people from all walks of life. However, as the Indian railway system evolved, it began to serve not just as a means of transportation but also as a canvas for showcasing luxury and heritage. In 1980, when Palace on Wheels was inaugurated, it made way for several other opulent trains in different parts of the country. South India was not left behind in this revolution, as the Golden Chariot became its first luxury train. Named after the famous stone chariot of Hampi, the train offers a glimpse into the region’s beauty while providing modern amenities to travelers. The Golden Chariot features guest carriages that are decorated with historical carvings and are named after the dynasties that ruled South India: Vijayanagar, Kadamba, Hoysala, Rastrakota, Ganga, Chalukya, Bhahamani, Adilshahi, Sangama, Shathavashna, and Yudukula. It has 40 cabins, including 13 double-beds, 26 twin-beds, and one specially designed for differently-abled guests, accommodating up to 80 passengers. Each cabin is adorned with furniture inspired by Hoysala and Mysore architecture, elegant drapery, and private washrooms. Smart TVs with Wi-Fi-enabled subscriptions cater to guests’ infotainment needs while safety measures like CCTV cameras and fire alarms enhance security. For relaxation guests can visit Arogya, a state-of-the-art spa with fitness facilities, or dine at the Golden Chariot’s fine-dining restaurants, Ruchi and Nalapak, which serve a mix of international and regional cuisines. The Golden Chariot offers two itineraries – The Pride of Karnataka (5 nights/6 days) package will start from Bengaluru to cover Bandipur, Mysore, Halebidu, Chikmagalur, Hampi, Goa and back to Bengaluru. This package is scheduled to start on December 14, 2024, January 4, February 1, and March 6, 2025. The second package is titled Jewels of South (5 nights/6 days) which will start from Bengaluru to cover Mysore, Kanchipuram, Mahabalipuram, Thanjavur, Chettinad, Cochin, Chertala, and back to Bengaluru. It is scheduled to start on December 21, 2024, and February 15, 2025. The fare of this luxurious train is a whopping Rs. 4.53 lakh per passenger, including meals, beverages, sightseeing, and guides. Would you travel on this train for this extravagant price tag? Comment below.Taller people have naturally much more leverage and proprioception than smaller people. The problem with weight classes is that they ignore skeletal mass. For example Conor McGregor was much taller than Jose Aldo when Aldo got defeated in 13 seconds. Likewise Khabib had a much wider upper body frame than McGregor when Khabib won their contest. Perhaps there's a more subjective element for putting similar sized contestants together. Maybe boxing partially bypasses the issue of height by prolonging the fights through softer hand gloves. MMA is a dangerous sport yet from a mental health perspective self-harm is tolerable. MMA isn't much more dangerous than other extreme sports like rock climbing. The aggressive symbolism of MMA isn't very helpful to law-and-order even though the same could be said about alcohol and social deprivation. Overall I support Conor McGregor in his enthusiasm for representing Ireland even if there are one or two question marks over the sport in general. Perhaps other Irish athletes in rugby or soccer are too media-shy in comparison to Mr. McGregor. Maybe athletes in team sports fail to take the initiative when it comes to representing their working class backgrounds in community activities. Conor's quick knockout of Aldo isn't too embarrassing for Aldo given that projectile warfare and gun duels can cause deaths in milliseconds. The way Conor McGregor’s career “kickstarted” in his late 20s was inspirational for older adults in other sports to keep working on reflexes. One way to distinguish combat sports from gladiator contests is that you could theoretically let the fight happen and wait until afterwards to jail and arrest them. What machismo forgets with mutual combat is that both parties might be so irrelevant that society can afford to arrest them where slight amorality can defeat immorality. Let's see when he is drooling and absent minded in his early 50s. Lumpy Talbot said: Let's see when he is drooling and absent minded in his early 50s. Click to expand... Perhaps one way McGregor resonates is with his temporary tension against his parents when he was opting to do a risky career in MMA instead of apprenticeships where they eventually reconciled after a few verbal confrontations. Paradoxically any physical pushing against his father toughened him up for his MMA career. This helps to explain celebrity worship syndrome where celebrities can be the exception that prove the rule as if our parents truly could be that negligent were truly destined to be a superstar!KTTA stock touches 52-week low at $2.87 amid market challenges
Caldicot choristers enjoy annual Christmas partyStocks in India may react to Assembly polls outcome, fund flows for fresh cues